Skip to content
StackGrid
Video conferencing

Google Meet vs Jitsi Meet

They differ on 9 of the 13 things buyers in this category actually ask about. Here is where, and what each one asks you to give up.

Bundled with Google Workspace, so it usually costs nothing extra.

Strongest argument

Included with Workspace — effectively free if you already pay Google

Biggest objection

Not viable for real webinars or external events

Webinar and large-event features are thin compared with Zoom.

Open-source video you can self-host with no per-seat cost.

Strongest argument

No licence cost at any team size

Biggest objection

Requires real infrastructure work to be reliable

Call quality at scale depends entirely on how well you run the servers.

The differences that matter

Where they actually diverge

Only the rows where the two disagree. Everything they both do is listed below.

CapabilityGoogle MeetJitsi Meet
Max participants500 people100 people
Automatic transcriptsYesNo
Phone dial-inYesNo
SAML single sign-onAvailable on some tier — check which, it is usually the expensive one.YesNo
SOC 2YesNo
Self-hostableNoYes
Open sourceNoYes
Public APINoYes
Native mobile appsYesNo

Cost

What each costs at 50 people

List price only. It ignores add-ons, seat minimums and the cost of the move itself — all of which routinely dwarf the difference below.

MeasureGoogle MeetJitsi Meet
Headline priceFreeFree
Per year at 50 people
Free tierYesYes

Prices are unverified estimates — useful for comparing orders of magnitude, not for budgeting. Confirm the current figure with the vendor before you commit to anything.

Common ground

What both of them do

These will not help you choose — which is exactly why they are worth knowing about before a vendor pitches one as a differentiator.

  • Webinars and eventsNo
  • RecordingYes
  • Guests join without installingYes
  • EU data residencyYes

In full

Every pro and con, both sides

Google Meet

  • Included with Workspace — effectively free if you already pay Google
  • No client to install; joining from a calendar invite just works
  • Live captions and transcripts are solid and included
  • Not viable for real webinars or external events
  • Recording requires the higher Workspace tiers
  • Fewer controls for moderating large or hostile audiences

Jitsi Meet

  • No licence cost at any team size
  • Self-hosted, so meeting data never leaves your infrastructure
  • Embeds cleanly into your own product
  • Requires real infrastructure work to be reliable
  • No native transcription or webinar tooling
  • Support is community-based unless you buy a commercial distribution

Questions

Google Meet vs Jitsi Meet, answered

Google Meet or Jitsi Meet — which is better?

Neither, in the abstract. Google Meet suits you if included with Workspace — effectively free if you already pay Google matters most; Jitsi Meet if no licence cost at any team size does. The honest trade-offs are: Google Meet — Webinar and large-event features are thin compared with Zoom. Jitsi Meet — Call quality at scale depends entirely on how well you run the servers.

Is Google Meet cheaper than Jitsi Meet?

They cost the same at list, so the decision comes down to fit rather than price.

Can we migrate from Google Meet to Jitsi Meet?

Usually yes, and the difficulty depends on history, integrations and headcount far more than on the two products. Data export quality is the thing to check first: ask both vendors what you can take with you before you commit to either. Our questionnaire produces a scoped estimate for the move.

What else should we consider besides Google Meet and Jitsi Meet?

In video conferencing the other credible options are Livestorm, Whereby, Zoom. Narrowing to two before you have written down your requirements is the most common way to end up with the wrong one.