Skip to content
StackGrid
Video conferencing

Jitsi Meet vs Livestorm

They differ on 7 of the 13 things buyers in this category actually ask about. Here is where, and what each one asks you to give up.

Open-source video you can self-host with no per-seat cost.

Strongest argument

No licence cost at any team size

Biggest objection

Requires real infrastructure work to be reliable

Call quality at scale depends entirely on how well you run the servers.

Livestorm

$99/seat

Browser-based webinar platform with registration and attendee analytics built in.

Strongest argument

Registration pages, reminder emails and attendance reporting included

Biggest objection

Expensive if you only need ordinary team meetings

Priced for webinars, not for daily internal standups.

The differences that matter

Where they actually diverge

Only the rows where the two disagree. Everything they both do is listed below.

CapabilityJitsi MeetLivestorm
Max participants100 people3,000 people
Webinars and eventsNoYes
Automatic transcriptsNoYes
SAML single sign-onAvailable on some tier — check which, it is usually the expensive one.NoYes
SOC 2NoYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Open sourceYesNo

Cost

What each costs at 50 people

List price only. It ignores add-ons, seat minimums and the cost of the move itself — all of which routinely dwarf the difference below.

MeasureJitsi MeetLivestorm
Headline priceFree$99/seat/mo
Per year at 50 people$59,400
Free tierYesYes

Prices are unverified estimates — useful for comparing orders of magnitude, not for budgeting. Confirm the current figure with the vendor before you commit to anything.

Common ground

What both of them do

These will not help you choose — which is exactly why they are worth knowing about before a vendor pitches one as a differentiator.

  • RecordingYes
  • Phone dial-inNo
  • Guests join without installingYes
  • EU data residencyYes
  • Public APIYes
  • Native mobile appsNo

In full

Every pro and con, both sides

Jitsi Meet

  • No licence cost at any team size
  • Self-hosted, so meeting data never leaves your infrastructure
  • Embeds cleanly into your own product
  • Requires real infrastructure work to be reliable
  • No native transcription or webinar tooling
  • Support is community-based unless you buy a commercial distribution

Livestorm

  • Registration pages, reminder emails and attendance reporting included
  • No download for attendees, which lifts show-up rates
  • CRM and marketing-automation integrations that actually close the loop
  • Expensive if you only need ordinary team meetings
  • Active-contact pricing surprises teams with large lists
  • Overkill for internal-only use

Questions

Jitsi Meet vs Livestorm, answered

Jitsi Meet or Livestorm — which is better?

Neither, in the abstract. Jitsi Meet suits you if no licence cost at any team size matters most; Livestorm if registration pages, reminder emails and attendance reporting included does. The honest trade-offs are: Jitsi Meet — Call quality at scale depends entirely on how well you run the servers. Livestorm — Priced for webinars, not for daily internal standups.

Is Jitsi Meet cheaper than Livestorm?

Jitsi Meet is cheaper at 50 people — Free against $99/seat/mo, roughly $0 against $59,400 a year. That gap of about $59,400 is rarely the whole story though — add-ons, seat minimums and the cost of migrating routinely outweigh it.

Can we migrate from Jitsi Meet to Livestorm?

Usually yes, and the difficulty depends on history, integrations and headcount far more than on the two products. Data export quality is the thing to check first: ask both vendors what you can take with you before you commit to either. Our questionnaire produces a scoped estimate for the move.

What else should we consider besides Jitsi Meet and Livestorm?

In video conferencing the other credible options are Google Meet, Whereby, Zoom. Narrowing to two before you have written down your requirements is the most common way to end up with the wrong one.