Skip to content
StackGrid
Project management

Linear vs Monday.com

They differ on 6 of the 13 things buyers in this category actually ask about. Here is where, and what each one asks you to give up.

Linear

$8/seat

Fast, opinionated issue tracking for product and engineering teams that want less process.

Strongest argument

Keyboard-first and genuinely fast, so engineers keep it up to date

Biggest objection

Limited customisation frustrates teams with regulated or unusual processes

Deliberately opinionated — if you need bespoke workflows and approval gates, it will fight you.

Monday.com

$12/seat

A visual, spreadsheet-shaped work platform you assemble per department.

Strongest argument

Boards are easy enough that each department builds its own

Biggest objection

Minimum seat tiers make small teams overpay

Seats are sold in tiers — you often pay for five when you need three.

The differences that matter

Where they actually diverge

Only the rows where the two disagree. Everything they both do is listed below.

CapabilityLinearMonday.com
Planning methodsSprints, KanbanKanban, Gantt / waterfall
Git and CI integrationFirst-classBasic
Portfolio reportingNoYes
Custom workflowsNoYes
Usable by non-engineersNoYes
EU data residencyNoYes

Cost

What each costs at 50 people

List price only. It ignores add-ons, seat minimums and the cost of the move itself — all of which routinely dwarf the difference below.

MeasureLinearMonday.com
Headline price$8/seat/mo$12/seat/mo
Per year at 50 people$4,800$7,200
Free tierYesYes

Prices are unverified estimates — useful for comparing orders of magnitude, not for budgeting. Confirm the current figure with the vendor before you commit to anything.

Common ground

What both of them do

These will not help you choose — which is exactly why they are worth knowing about before a vendor pitches one as a differentiator.

  • No-code automationYes
  • SAML single sign-onYes
  • SOC 2Yes
  • Self-hostableNo
  • Open sourceNo
  • Public APIYes
  • Native mobile appsYes

In full

Every pro and con, both sides

Linear

  • Keyboard-first and genuinely fast, so engineers keep it up to date
  • Cycles, triage and projects work well with no configuration
  • GitHub, GitLab and Slack integrations are first-class
  • Limited customisation frustrates teams with regulated or unusual processes
  • Reporting is lighter than Jira’s, which matters to some leadership teams
  • Less suited to non-engineering departments sharing the same instance

Monday.com

  • Boards are easy enough that each department builds its own
  • Strong automations and dashboards without any code
  • One platform stretches to CRM, HR and ops use cases
  • Minimum seat tiers make small teams overpay
  • Very large boards slow down noticeably
  • Flexibility drifts into inconsistency across departments over time

Questions

Linear vs Monday.com, answered

Linear or Monday.com — which is better?

Neither, in the abstract. Linear suits you if keyboard-first and genuinely fast, so engineers keep it up to date matters most; Monday.com if boards are easy enough that each department builds its own does. The honest trade-offs are: Linear — Deliberately opinionated — if you need bespoke workflows and approval gates, it will fight you. Monday.com — Seats are sold in tiers — you often pay for five when you need three.

Is Linear cheaper than Monday.com?

Linear is cheaper at 50 people — $8/seat/mo against $12/seat/mo, roughly $4,800 against $7,200 a year. That gap of about $2,400 is rarely the whole story though — add-ons, seat minimums and the cost of migrating routinely outweigh it.

Can we migrate from Linear to Monday.com?

Usually yes, and the difficulty depends on history, integrations and headcount far more than on the two products. Data export quality is the thing to check first: ask both vendors what you can take with you before you commit to either. Our questionnaire produces a scoped estimate for the move.

What else should we consider besides Linear and Monday.com?

In project management the other credible options are Asana, ClickUp, Jira. Narrowing to two before you have written down your requirements is the most common way to end up with the wrong one.